Elon Musk is endless The attempt to take over Twitter has taken another strange turn, as it appears that the social media platform has acceded to the employer’s request to access a “hose of” internal data from the company. ‘company.
For weeks, Musk has been pushing Twitter to provide data that would allow the South African businessman to check if a significant portion of the platform’s users are fake bot accounts, which he believes would lower the price he would be willing to pay for company. Musk claims that bot accounts account for more than 5 percent of Twitter’s user base, which even critics of Musk believe is true, and wants the company to deny it.
Twitter has reported a lower number of non-authentic accounts in its financial results, and according to The Washington Post, is willing to give Musk access to every tweet posted daily, along with granular information from the user, in order to allow him to look for untrue behavior. Informally, this data is referred to as the “fire hose.” Twitter rejected WIRED’s request to confirm or deny the Publication Twitter’s apparent intent to grant Musk access to the data stream comes days after the suitor’s lawyers sent a letter to the company saying it was “actively resisting and frustrating.” [Musk’s] information rights ”and threatening to withdraw from the agreement.
The informed change to give Musk access to the data is important and raises two key questions: one, will Musk get what he wants from the data he has been given? And two: what does it mean to have access to the privacy and security of everyday users?
For Axel Bruns, a professor at Queensland University of Technology, the move is what Twitter calls Musk’s Lighthouse. “By giving him access to the fire hose, Twitter can probably say, ‘Test your claims about the abundance of robots,'” Bruns said. and for someone with the skills to handle this level of data, it’s unlikely to be the right method to answer the question. on the social media platform every day will really help Musk answer the key question he says is holding back his Twitter buying: the proportion of users who are robots. “It looks a bit performative,” says Paddy Leerssen, a researcher at right of information at the University of Amsterdam. “My point is that this data is not what you need to find out who a bot is or not.”
Being able to identify what makes a bot a bot has been a hotly debated topic in academia, a topic to which experts have devoted much of their working lives, which is why they are skeptical about the access to all tweets posted on Twitter. will answer the bot’s question enough to convince Musk to continue with the purchase. “My impression is that people tend to overestimate how easy it is to detect robots,” says Leerssen. “A tool like this [the fire hose] will not allow you to do so unless you combine it with all sorts of other search methods. I don’t think that’s something that in a timeline like this, Elon Musk has time for. “The man who could answer how this data would help him identify the robots, Musk himself, did not respond to a request for feedback sent by email.